Hacker grabs $600m in cryptocash from blockchain company Poly Networks


Remember Mt. Gox? Sure you do!

Although it’s usually said aloud as “Mount Gox”, as if it were a topographic feature, it actually started life as MTGOX, short for Magic: The Gathering Online Exchange, where MTG fans could trade cards via the internet.

The web domain was eventually repurposed for what was, back in 2014, the world’s biggest Bitcoin cryptocurrency exchange.

Mt. Gox was headquartered in Japan, holding what was then a mind-blowing $500,000,000 in other people’s bitcoins (BTC).

And then a strange thing happened: the money, or at least the bitcoins, vanished, just like that.

We’ve never really found out what happened.

Early suggestions blamed a cryptographic flaw known as transaction malleability, but sceptics argued that this sort of treachery, even if if were possible on such an epic scale, would be visible in the Bitcoin transaction record, also known as the blockchain.

Simply put, transaction malleability means that two different transactions can be rigged to have the same supposedly unique identifier. Crooked transactors could, in theory, fraudulently concoct duplicate-yet-different transaction pairs, and use these transactions to trick a naive exchange into thinking that something had gone wrong. Them the crooks could dishonestly repudiate one of the transactions in each pair and demand a refund.

Some people suspected Mt. Gox insiders of simply taking the missing bitcoins (or some of them, anyway) for themselves.

Indeed, on New Year’s Day 2015, Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun publicly stated that there was “strong suspicion” that most of the missing Bitcoins were ripped off from inside.

Yomiuri Shimbun’s considered opinion was that no more than 1% of the loss could be explained by external hacking or cyberscamming – for example due to transaction malleability tricks – and therefore that 99% of the loot had simply been plundered from within.

Intriguingly, Mt. Gox founder Mark Karpelès was arrested, and ultimately given a suspended prison sentence in Japan, but not because of the missing bitcoins – he was found guilty of mispreresenting the value of his company to make it look like a better investment.

Even more weirdly, lawyers for Ross Ulbricht, currently serving two life sentences in the US for running the infamous Silk Road site on the dark web, argued – without success, given that their client was convicted – that it was Karpelès, not Ulbricht, who was behind the notorious website.

And in what may be the weirdest cryptocurrency twist of all in this part of our story, a federal agent from the US Secret Service, Shaun Bridges, who investigated the Silk Road case, was himself convicted of stealing several hundreds of thousands of dollars of bitcoins from the Silk Road site.

Bridges (and you have probably guessed this by now) stashed his ill-gotten gains on the Mt. Gox exchange.

You coudln’t make this stuff up… and, at the end of it all, we still can’t answer the question, “What really happened when Mt. Gox got hacked?”

Plus ça change

Well, we’re now in the middle of In other episode of the “Cryptocurrency Truth is Stranger than Fiction” saga.

Online blockchain company Poly Networks, which describes itself as a company that was “built to implement interoperability between multiple [block]chains in order to build the next generation internet infrastructure”, has been hacked.

A blockchain, simply put, is a public ledger that lists details such as financial payments or contractual agreements.

A contract might be some sort of algorithm such as “when Pete sends me the $50 he owes me, I’ll automatically pay $20 of that to Jane, send $15 to Naledi, and keep the rest in my cryptocoin wallet.”

A transaction might record that “wallet B457F has transferred $30 to wallet 7EE19, with $4.50 of transaction fees claimed from B457F by wallet 1445A”.

As you can imagine, a hacker who could inject fraudulent contracts and transfers into a system of this sort could wreak havoc, for example by triggering a series of automated payments into cryptocoin wallets of their own, and then running off with the proceeds.

And that it exactly what seems to have happened to Poly Networks, apparently to the tune of $600,000,000, dizzyingly breaking the Mt. Gox “megahack” record by some $100 million.

What happened?

How the hack happened is not yet certain.

Some reports are blaming the attack on “stolen private keys”, which basically implies that the hacker got hold of the authentication codes needed to approve a whole raft of fraudulent activities.

Twitter user @kelvinfichter, however, who tweets under the self-assured name of God-like Natural Number Creator Person (TM, R), claims to have identified various cryptographic blunders in Poly Network’s transaction protoocol.

Fichter says that this blunder would have allowed the hacker to set the fraudulent transactions in train using cryptographic keypairs they had created themselves.

This means that, instead of being forced to use public keys that could only be verified by private keys held by other principals in the transaction, the hacker was able to use public keys for which they themselves had the matching private keys.

That’s a bit like appearing on a criminal charge where your defence attorney not only gets to present your case to the court, but then also gets to act as judge and jury in deciding whether to acquit you.

Would you like your money back?

Astonishingly, the hacker decided to send a note to Poly Networks.

And what better way than to generate a public transaction with no value, but with some added data, like this:

The Input Data field above, 52454144 5920544f 20524554 55524e20 54484520 46554e44 21, is the ASCII encoding of the message:


That was followed a minute later by another hidden message:

This time, the hexadecimal data above decodes as:


Since then, Poly Networks has asked as follows:

As far as we can see [2021-08-11], the ETH account above has only received about $3000 so far.

But the Polygon wallet has picked up $1,010,100.

That “binary-like” number is apparently the result of three transactions in quick succession this morning, first of $100, then $10,000 and then a full $1,000,000:

According to other reports, Poly Networks has also received a repayment of $622,000 in a cryptocoin known as Fei, and a whopping 260 billions’ worth of SHIBA INU cryptocoins.

As dramatic as the last “refund” might sound, the current exchange rate for SHIBA INU is about 125,000 SHIBs to the US dollar, assuming you could find anyone to cash them out into hard currency, so the nominal value there is about $2,000,000.

Unfortunately, that leaves Poly Networks short by more than 99% of the funds that originally went missing, given than the total theoretical value of the cryptocoins returned is about $4,000,000.

What next?

As in the Mt. Gox case, we may never discover the full truth of what happened.

Poly Networks may never get the funds back, and as for how much the company’s customers stand to lose, we can only guess.

Perhaps the hacker or hackers are now fearful of being caught, and will aim to make amends?

Perhaps they will eventually return all, or at least most, of the vanishing cryptocoins?

Perhaps the hackers are just playing with Poly Networks and have no intention of paying back more than they have already?

Only time will tell.

What to do?

In the meantime, we will leave you with two suggestions:

  • If you’re thinking of getting into the cryptocurrency scene, never invest more than you can afford to lose. There are more than 10,000 different cryptocoins currently in existence, many of which were kicked off by cash injections from early investors. Not all cryptocoins can or will follow the Bitcoin pattern of going from a few cents in value in 2010 to $40,000 each in 2021. Even worse, some are outright scams in which the “creators” of the cryptocoinage collect startup funds from early investors in what’s known as an ICO (initial coin offering), only to run off without ever establishing the new cryptocurrency at all.
  • If you plan to buy and hold cryptocurrency, keep as much of you can offline in what’s known as a cold wallet. A cold wallet is an encrypted file that you keep where you won’t lose track of it, and where other people can’t use it unless they know your password.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Chinese Actor SecShow Conducts Massive DNS Probing on Global Scale
Ascension Attack Caused by Employee Downloading Malicious File
Microsoft Admits Security Failings Allowed China to Access US Government Emails
New Attack Technique ‘Sleepy Pickle’ Targets Machine Learning Models
WeLiveSecurity wins Best Cybersecurity Vendor Blog award!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *